Real-time dynamic data validation apparatus and computer readable media for intelligent fields

ABSTRACT

Apparatus and computer readable media for managing an intelligent field, are provided. An exemplary apparatus can include hydrocarbon well instruments, a SCADA system, a process integration server and/or dynamic field data analyzing computer, and memory/computer readable media storing a dynamic field data analyzing computer program. The computer program can include instructions that when executed cause the dynamic field data analyzing computer to perform various operations to include receiving real-time dynamic field data, analyzing validity of the dynamic field data, validating values of the field data, validating a state/condition of a well, and flagging well components, well conditions, and/or well state validation issues.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a non-provisional of and claims priority to and thebenefit of U.S. Patent App. No. 61/582,350, filed on Dec. 31, 2011,titled “Real-Time Dynamic Data Validation Apparatus, System, ProgramCode, Computer Readable Medium, and Methods For Intelligent Fields,” andis related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/731,238, filed on Dec.31, 2012, titled “Real-Time Dynamic Data Validation Methods forIntelligent Fields, ” each incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to the oil and gas industry,particularly reservoir management, and more particularly to apparatus,systems, program code, and methods for managing an intelligent field.

2. Description of the Related Art

Advances in technology continue to have a great impact on the petroleumindustry. Within the past 20, years, many technologies have transformedthe way oil and gas companies manage and/or optimize their operations.One such technology includes permanent downhole monitoring systems(PDHMS), which were introduced over 20, years ago. A PDHMS surface unittypically is used to collect subsurface sensor performance data, i.e.,pressure and temperature gauges. Other technologies include, forexample, multiphase flow meters (MPFMs) which provide individual flowrates for oil, gas, and water in a producing well, wellhead pressure andtemperature (WHP/T) measurement devices which provide measured wellheadpressure and temperature, tubing/casing annulus (TCA) pressure measuringdevices, and electrical submersible pump (ESP) devices for assisting theoil to the surface, which provide measurable electrical and pumpparameters.

Early installations were often in the form of self-contained deviceshaving removable modules. Some more conventional configurations includewire or fiber-optic connection, which communicate the data tosurface-based units. Others include a network topography which providessuch data between the various sensors and the surface-based units.

Initial methodologies of transferring the data received by thesurface-based units to a central computer or monitoring station includeduse of physical transport and/or transmission over land-based wirelines. More recent technologies employed by the assignee of therespective invention or inventions include utilization of radiowave welldata monitoring which can include individual well transmitters thattransmit to a remote terminal unit (RTU) that sends the data by UHFradio to an information server or SCADA system, which can then migratethe data over a local communication network to desktops of productionengineers. An exemplary system is described, for example, in U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 12/547,295,, titled: “Intelligent Field Oil and GasField Data Acquisition, Delivery, Control, and Retention BasedApparatus, Program Product and Related Methods,” incorporated byreference in its entirety. Similar technologies include utilization ofglobal satellite mobile or cellular telephone based communication, whichhave generally been employed as a backup to provide alerts. Suchtechnologies of remote monitoring of field data can provide the wellheadpressure, wellhead temperature, downhole pressure, downhole temperature,annuli pressures, fluid flow rate for individual fluid phases, andelectrical submersible pump data, both in real-time and on demand, toallow centralized well control.

The field data, however, can be unreliable, e.g., outside the boundariesof valid data. The field data can also be invalid, e.g., within theboundaries of valid data but substantially deviating from expected datavalues based on given conditions. The field data can also be incomplete,e.g., missing data.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Recognized by the inventors, therefore, is the need for apparatus,systems, program code/computer readable medium, and methods to identifyand process unreliable data, to identify and process invalid data, andwhich can identify and process incomplete data.

In view of the foregoing, various embodiments of the present inventionprovide real-time dynamic data validation of data from/for intelligentfield components, real-time advance validation that combines multipleengineering logics to validate dynamic data values, and real-timeanomalies detection (e.g., badwater production, well on/off state orcondition), bad fluid rate, bad fluid increase or decrease, etc.) thattrigger alerts for immediate action to be taken to ensure, in real-time,to provide optimum well performance. Various embodiments of the presentinvention provide an alternative methodology of estimating the totalfluid production rate and gradient. Various embodiments of the presentinvention also provide a methodology to confirm water production byusing down hole pressure and temperature sensors, a methodology torecommend I-Field equipment corrected calibrations, and a methodologythat provides a real time well productivity index (PI) estimation.

Various embodiments of the present invention advantageously provideapparatus, systems, program code/computer readable medium, and methodsof managing and intelligent field through the retrieval and processingof real-time dynamic data validation to raw data, typically firstidentified as being within the boundaries of reliable data (within thecontinuum of machine possibilities), but not yet determined to be valid(within the continuum of expected conditions).

More specifically, an example of an embodiment of an apparatus formanaging intelligent field. According to the exemplary embodiment, theapparatus includes a plurality of hydrocarbon well instruments. The wellinstruments data can include a permanent downhole monitoring system(PDHMS), a multiphase flow meter (MPFM), a wellhead pressure (WHP) andwellhead temperature (WHT) measurement device, a tubing or casingannulus (TCA) pressure measurement, and optionally, an electricalsubmersible pump (ESP) when required or otherwise desired. The apparatuscan also include a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA)system for an intelligent hydrocarbon recovery field system operablycoupled to the plurality of well instruments to receive data therefrom.The apparatus can also include a process integration (PI) server for theintelligent field system operably coupled to the SCADA system to receivedata therefrom. The apparatus can also include a dynamic field dataanalyzing computer operably coupled to the PI server to receive datatherefrom. The apparatus can also include dynamic field data analyzingcomputer program stored in the memory of the dynamic field dataanalyzing computer and/or deliverable on a standalone computer readablemedium.

The dynamic field data analyzing computer program can includeinstructions that when executed by the dynamic field data analyzingcomputer (i.e., one or more processors associated therewith), cause thecomputer to perform various operations to include receiving at leastsubstantially real-time dynamic field data for an intelligent fieldsystem. The received data can include at least substantially real-timefield data, but more typically, real-time field data with a negligibledelay, containing one or more component data values for each of aplurality of well instruments for each of a plurality of wells. Theoperations can also include determining a plurality of well parametersfor a corresponding plurality of different well conditions for each wellresponsive to the received dynamic field data and analyzing the validityof the plurality of well parameters. The analysis can include comparingeach of the plurality of the well parameters (e.g., actual componentdata for one or more of the well instruments) to correspondingvalidation criteria, typically generated from the other of the wellinstrument parameter values. The operations can also include validatingthe values of the field data for at least one well instrument when theactual component data value falls within the validation criteria, andflagging the actual component data value for the at least one wellinstrument when the actual component data value falls outside thevalidation criteria. The operations can also include validating a wellstate or condition when a plurality of well conditions associatedtherewith have valid well parameters that satisfy the correspondingvalidation criteria, and flagging the well state or condition when thevalues are out of tolerance.

Various embodiments the present invention also include methods formanaging an intelligent field. According to an exemplary embodiment of amethod, the method steps can include receiving at least substantiallyreal-time dynamic field data for an intelligent field system,determining a plurality of well parameters for a corresponding pluralityof different well conditions responsive to the received dynamic fielddata, and analyzing the validity of the plurality of well parameters.The analysis can include comparing each of the plurality of the wellparameters (e.g., actual component data for one or more of the wellinstruments) to corresponding validation criteria, typically generatedfrom the other of the well instrument parameter values. The steps canalso include validating the values of the field data for the at leastone well instrument when the actual component data value falls withinthe validation criteria, and flagging the actual component data valuefor the at least one well instrument when the actual component datavalue falls outside the validation criteria. The steps can also includevalidating a well state or condition when a plurality of well conditionsassociated therewith have valid well parameters that satisfy thecorresponding validation criteria, and flagging the well state orcondition when the values are out of tolerance.

Various embodiments of the present invention provide manpower timeoptimization through implementation of various automated data validationprocesses, provide a manpower time reduction by effectively detectingand requesting I-Field component calibration, improve the process ofdetecting real time data validation issues, improve engineering datamining and supporting data analysis process, ensure data supportsultimate objective of reservoir management through effective decisionmaking, provide early detection for water breakthrough, provide earlydetection for gas segregation at the reservoir face, ensure optimum wellproductivity, improve I-field component working efficiency, and guarantyI-field network component optimization.

Early detection of water breakthrough and/or increased water productionas well as early detection of gas segregation at the reservoir face canadvantageously be provided as a result of the real-time monitoring ofthe trend in the bottom hole fluid gradient. Optimum well productivitycan advantageously be provided by monitoring any variation on the bottomhole fluid gradient, wellhead temperature, and wellhead pressure values,for example, to prevent early water breakthrough, gas separation, etc.,which can cause severe damage to the formation. I-field networkcomponent optimization can advantageously be provided by utilization oftriggers and alarms indicating when data is not meeting engineeringlogics and/or requiring validation for proper inspection andcalibration, which can allow I-field components to work at near maximumefficiency.

Various embodiments of the present invention advantageously provide forimproving the process of validation real time data, provide a newprocess to calibrate I-field component such as multi-phase flow meters(MPFM), provide a new process to estimate in real time fluid gradient,provide a new process to back calculate water cut, support expeditingremedial actions of I-field components through early anomaliesdetection, ensure valid data at engineering desktop, and provide forshifting focus to engineering analysis rather than data mining. Variousembodiments of the present invention advantageously provide a platformfor other innovative intelligent field projects through ensuring thevalidity of the data in real time, validate and manage massive amount ofreal time data with minimum engineering effort, and improve the processof validating real time data. Various embodiments of the presentinvention advantageously provide a system/apparatus that has thecapacity to monitor, and proactively detect, any anomalies from oil andwater injector wells, as captured by real-time data.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

So that the manner in which the features and advantages of theinvention, as well as others which will become apparent, may beunderstood in more detail, a more particular description of theinvention briefly summarized above may be had by reference to theembodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings,which form a part of this specification. It is to be noted, however,that the drawings illustrate only various embodiments of the inventionand are therefore not to be considered limiting of the invention's scopeas it may include other effective embodiments as well.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a general architecture of an apparatusfor managing an intelligent field according to an embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram high-level overview of data flow from theattainment of real-time raw/processed data from well instruments to theprovision of validated data to engineers according to an embodiment ofthe present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary data validationworkflow for an oil-producing well according to an embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary data flow forvalidating well on and off conditions for oil producers according to anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary data flow forvalidating permanent downhole monitoring system (PDHMS) measurements andestimating, real-time, the fluid gradient using associated bottom holegauge measurements according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating a fluid gradient versus time trendanalysis illustrating recognition of water incursion and gas segregationaccording to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary data flow forvalidating multiphase flow meter (MPFM) measurements and identifyingwater breakthrough and identifying/estimating water production accordingto an embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary data flow forvalidating MPFM measurements and identifying gas breakthrough/gas comingon solution and identifying/estimating gas production according to anembodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter withreference to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate embodiments ofthe invention. This invention may, however, be embodied in manydifferent forms and should not be construed as limited to theillustrated embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments areprovided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and willfully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.Like numbers refer to like elements throughout. Prime notation, if used,indicates similar elements in alternative embodiments.

Ensuring the flow of reliable, valid, and complete real-time data fromthe various intelligent field (I-field) components to engineers' desktopis a vital process to efficiently utilize real-time data in fieldmanagement. Various apparatus, systems, computer program/computerreadable medium, and methods for monitoring the reliability of keyperformance indicators in intelligent oil fields, termed “WDEye,” aredescribed, for example, in U.S. Patent App. No. 61/561,541, filed Nov.18, 2011,, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Variousapparatus, systems, computer program/computer readable medium, andseveral methods for managing an intelligent field to includeproviding/applying real-time dynamic data validation/estimation, termed“WDvalidation,” advanced anomaly detection, and correct equipmentcalibration specification/recommendations for I-field components, aredescribed below.

Various embodiments of the present invention employ multiple reservoirmanagement and production engineering logics that can interact with eachother in order to provide for determining a specific event related to awell. Each logic can react based upon the data to be validated byapplying a weight average to each component of each logic. Further,various embodiments of the present invention apply a new methodology toestimate, in real time, the bottom hole fluid gradient, and a newmethodology which utilizes the bottom hole fluid gradient to preciselyestimate water influx into a well. Various embodiments of the presentinvention provide real time advance validation and anomalies detectionthat trigger alerts for immediate action to be taken to ensure, in realtime, optimum well performance. Various embodiments of the presentinvention also provide an automated process of validating, in real time,the well on and off state/condition for oil, water injection (PWI), andobservation wells; the oil, water and gas rate changes; and the surfaceand bottom hole pressure and temperature, along with others. Variousembodiments of the present invention provide a new methodology toestimate, in real time, fluid gradient trending, as well as aninnovative new methodology to calibrate surface I-fields components suchas multiphase flow meters (MPFM), well head pressure and temperaturemeasuring equipment, among others, against a set of reservoir managementand production engineering logics.

Additionally, various embodiments of the present invention provide anautomated process for validating, in real time, wellhead pressure andtemperature (WHP/T) measurements, tubing/casing annulus (TCA) pressure,choke size, electrical submersible pump (ESP) readings and rateestimation, along with real time flow rate estimation for a producingwell completed with an ESP. The various embodiments of the presentinvention can incorporate ESP parameters such as, for example, bottomhole dynamic pressure (intake and discharge), electrical parameters(amps), working frequency (hz), FWHP (psi). Utilizing these parameters,a synthetic rate can be estimated. Additionally, various embodiments ofthe present invention can estimate, in real time, and incorporate, theproductivity index (PI) and injection index (II).

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of an apparatus 30 for managing anintelligent field through real-time dynamic data validation. Theapparatus 30 can include a dynamic field data validity analyzingcomputer 31 having a processor 33, memory 35 coupled to the processor 33to store software and database records therein, and a user interface 37that can include a graphical display 39 for displaying graphical images,and a user input device 41 as known to those skilled in the art, toprovide a user access to manipulate the software and database records.Note, the computer 31 can be in the form of a personal computer or inthe form of a server or multiple servers serving multiple userinterfaces 37. Accordingly, the user interface 37 can be either directlyconnected to the computer 31 or through a network 38 as known to thoseskilled in the art. The plurality of well instruments 40 are either indirect coupled communication with the computer 31, for example, vianetwork 38, or in communication via manual delivery and unloading.

The apparatus 30 can also include one or more tables and/or databases 43stored in memory (internal or external) that is operably coupled to thedynamic field data validity analyzing computer 31, as would beunderstood by those skilled in the art. The one or more databases 43 caninclude validated field data, validated well parameters including, forexample, validated bottom hole fluid gradient data, and can includevalidated well state/condition data.

The apparatus 30 can also include dynamic field data validity analyzingcomputer program 51 stored in memory 35 of the dynamic field datavalidity analyzing computer 31 to provide for analyzing and validatingdynamic field data, flagging component data points of well instruments40 that lie outside an expected range of values given component datavalues of a plurality of other well instruments 40, estimating bottomhole fluid gradient trends, determining bottom hole pressure andtemperature trends, determining multi phase (e.g., gas, oil, and water)flow trends, determining wellhead pressure (WHP) and wellheadtemperature (WHT) trends, determining tubing or casing annulus (TCA)pressure trends, and determining electrical submersible pump (ESP)parameter trends.

The computer program 51 also provides for analyzing the validity of wellparameters and validating well conditions and states, to include wellshut-in, well on, oil production increase, oil production decrease, gasoil ratio (GOR) increase, GOR decrease, water cut increase, water cutdecrease, bottom hole pressure decrease, bottom hole pressure increase,bottom hole temperature decrease, and bottom hole temperature increasestates/conditions for an oil producer well; well off, well on, waterinjection rate increase, and water injection rate decreasestates/conditions for a water injector well; and well off and well onstates/conditions for an observation well, just to name a few.

Specific readings can also be validated. For example, choke sizevariation can be validated by integrating data from the WHP, WHT, bottomhole pressure (BHP), and/or bottom hole temperature (BHT). ESP readingcan be validated for a comparison of BHP, amps, working frequency, andflowing well head pressure (FWHP). Rate estimation validation isperformed using pumping working parameters.

Note, the dynamic field data validity analyzing computer program 51 canbe in the form of microcode, programs, routines, and symbolic languagesthat provide a specific set or sets of ordered operations that controlthe functioning of the hardware and direct its operation, as known andunderstood by those skilled in the art. Note also, the dynamic fielddata validity analyzing computer program 51, according to one or more ofthe embodiments of the present invention, need not reside in itsentirety in volatile memory, but can be selectively loaded, asnecessary, according to various methodologies as known and understood bythose skilled in the art.

Beneficially, various embodiments of the apparatus 30 can primarily usethe real time fluid gradient trend to identify and detect waterbreakthrough. Fluid gradient alteration (increase) is a clearpreliminary indication of water entry. Immediately after this detection,the apparatus 30 can perform a smart analysis that can integrate manymore well parameters such as, for example, surface well head and bottomhole temperature and pressure to confirm the possible water entry. Incase of presence of a multiphase flow meter (MPFM), the apparatus cancross check the values and highlight any anomaly. Further, by obtainingthe derivative of the fluid gradient trending changes, water productionvalues can be estimated.

Various embodiments of the apparatus 30 can also provide a process torecommend correction of calibration for I-field equipment. In general,proper calibration criteria will be provided after quantifying thediscrepancy. For MPFM calibration, a calibration may be required insituations where the MPFM is reporting water production while the fluidgradient, well head pressure, and wellhead temperature are reflecting nopresence of water. Additionally, calibration may be required insituations where the MPFM reported parameters do not meet logic criteriafor the respective well on and off condition. For example, the MPFM maybe sending flow rate data (oil, GOR, WC) while the well is in an offstate/condition. For example, in a case where the surface MPFM isreporting 50% water cut (water production), but the bottom hole fluidgradient trend, wellhead pressure, and/or wellhead temperature arereflecting no presence of water (e.g., fluid gradient stable and nosevere drop in well head pressure or increase in wellhead temperature),the apparatus 30 will send out an alert advising that the MPFM requirescalibration. This example illustrates utilization of water cut valuesonly so the calibration will normally be directed only to the MPFM waterproduction detection component. In case discrepancies in the gas oilratio (GOR), for example, the apparatus 30 will advise calibration onthis component as well.

Various embodiments of the apparatus 30 can also provide real-timeproductivity index (PI) estimation (barrels of oil per pound pressuredifferential) typically written as Qo barrels of oil/reservoir pressuredifferential for bottom hole flowing pressure. This value is estimated,in real time, and can be integrated with multiple parameters to confirmthe value. As with PI, the injection index (II) estimation validationincludes implementation of conventional steps in conjunction with theaddition of logic integration in real time, of several parameters suchas, for example, FWHP/T, BHP/T, and choke changes.

The following tables illustrate examples of typical physical wellstates. The tables present logics which can be employed by the computerprogram 51 to perform the validation. Each table includes a plurality ofrules typically in the form of validated and/or observed wellconditions, a selected tolerance, a relative weight of the respectiverule in relation to the other rules, and a preferred minimum number ofrules which should be utilized in validating the particular well state.Where a rule is in the form of calculated/estimated well condition suchas, for example, a trend in a specific well parameter or parameters, therespective well parameter or parameters are themselves first determinedto be validated and reliable according to an exemplary embodiment.

The following ten tables illustrate the active well logic to perform avalidation of the various states/conditions for an oil-producing well.The logic described in the first two tables allows the user todifferentiate between reliable and non-reliable zero rates. The zerorate for non-active well (shut-in) should be reliable. At least threeconditions with valid parameters must be satisfied to identify theon/off status of the well and then validate the rate. The zero rate willbe considered non-reliable if at least three of the conditions withvalid data were not satisfied:

Oil Producer Wells:

Well Shut-in State/Condition:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Upstreampressure = ±25% 30 3 Downstream pressure WHT Decrease, close to ±5% 50ambient Temperature Choke size <2% 10 Flowing BHP increase ≧10% 30Flowing BHT decrease 4° F. 20 below average ESP Hz = 0 40 Amp = 0 40

Well ON State/State/Condition:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Upstreampressure # ±25% 30 3 Downstream pressure WHT increase 5% ≧ ambient 50Choke size >2% 20 ESP Hz > 0 40 Amp > 0 40

Oil Production Increase

Minimum number of rules Rule Tolerance Weight to be checked. Flowingwell head 5% 30 3 pressure decrease WHT increase 2% 20 Choke sizeincrease 2% 30 BHP decrease 5% 40 BHT increase 2% 20 Hz increase 1% 40Bottom hole intake P decrease 5% 20 Bottom hole discharge P increase 5%20

Oil Production Decrease

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. WHPincrease 2% 30 3 WHT decrease but still 2% above ambient 30 aboveambient Choke size decrease 2% 20 BHP increase 3% 30 BHT decrease 2% 10Hz decrease 3% 20 Amp decrease 3% 20

Water Cut Increase:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. WHPdecrease 15% 30 2 Fluid gradient increase ≧0.02 50 WHT increase ≧2° F.20 BHP decrease  5% 20

Water Cut Decrease:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. WHPincrease ≧15% 30 2 Fluid gradient decrease 0.02 40 WHT decrease 2° F. 20BHP increase     5% 20

In an oil well, the gas oil ratio (GOR) should be constant. Changes inthe GOR, however, can follow the following logics:

GOR Increase:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Water cutincrease 10 2 WHP increase ≧15% 20 Fluid gradient decrease 0.02 50 WHTdecrease 2° F. 20

GOR Decrease:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. WHPdecrease 15% 30 2 Fluid gradient increase ≧0.02 50 WHT increase ≧2° F.20

Bottom hole temperature (BHT) and bottom hole pressure (BHP) can beverified utilizing measurements from a permanent down holepressure/temperature measurement system (PDHMS). Note, BHP and BHTvalues will always be>0.

Bottom Hole Pressure Decrease:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Choke sizeincrease ≧2% 40 2 Well head temperature ≧5% 50 increase Bottom holetemperature ≧5% 30 increase

Bottom Hole Pressure Increase:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Choke sizedecrease 2% 40 2 Well head temperature 5% 50 decrease Bottom holetemperature 5% 30 decrease

The following four tables illustrate the active well logic to perform avalidation of the various states/conditions for power well injectors(PWI).

Water Injectors (PWI):

On and Off Well State/Condition:

Well OFF State/Condition:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Choke sizeless than 5% 40 2 WHP decrease 50% 50 WHT decrease, close to ≧2° F. 30ambient Temp

Well ON State/Condition:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Choke sizegreater 40 2 than 10% WHP increase 50% 50 WHT increase 2° F. > ambient30

Water Injection Rate:

Water Injection Rate Increase:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Choke sizeincrease ≧20% 40 2 WHP increase ≧10% 40 WHT increase     5% 30

Water Injection Rate Decrease:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Choke sizedecrease 20% 40 2 WHP decrease 20% 40 WHT decrease  5% 30

The following tables illustrate the active well logic to perform avalidation of the various states/conditions for observation wells.

Observation Wells:

Well OFF State/Condition:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Choke size<0.2 20 2-3 depending upon the WHP decrease 20 30 combination ofselected WHT decrease, close 5° F. 50 rules to ambient BHP Stable 20% 30BHT Stable 10% 20

Well ON State/Condition:

Minimum number of Rule Tolerance Weight rules to be checked. Chokesize > 0 20 2-3 depending upon the WHP increase 20% 30 combination ofselected WHT increase, above ≧5° F. 50 rules ambient BHP decrease 20% 30BHT decrease 10% 20

Note, the above tables are provided for illustrative purposes,additional rules, tolerances, weights, and minimum number ofcombinations are, however, within the scope of the present invention.

Data Flow

FIGS. 2-8 provide a graphical illustration of the data flow andemployment of engineering logic, which can include data validation andcomponent anomaly detection according to various exemplary embodimentsthe present invention. FIG. 2, for example, illustrates a high-leveloverview of data flow beginning from attainment of real-timeraw/processed data from the well instruments 40 to the provision ofvalidated data to engineers' desktops.

FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary data validation workflow for anoil-producing well. At block 101, real-time (RT) data flows into andthrough a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system/serveror other information server, and to a process integration (PI) server(block 103). The real-time raw data flow is then received and processedfor validation (blocks 105, 107). If the data meets validation criteria(block 109), the data is deemed validated and stored in database 43(block 111). If the data does not meet the validation criteria at block109 and the data has reliability issues (e.g., outside possible machinelimits) as opposed to validation issues (outside expected ranges ofvalues, but in this analysis, within possible machine limits) as shownat block 113, an automated report is generated and sent indicating thatthe data is not valid or reliable (block 115). If the data is reliablebut not valid at block 113, an automated alert and report is generatedto initiate component troubleshooting and well measurement instrumentcomponent repair (block 117).

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary data flow for validating well on and offconditions for oil producers. At block 121, real-time data flows intoand through a SCADA system/server or other information server, and to aprocess integration server (block 123). The real-time raw data flow isthen received and processed for validation (blocks 125). If the datameets on and off condition validation criteria (block 127), the data isdeemed validated and stored in database 43 (block 129). If the data doesnot meet the validation criteria at block 127 and the data is determinedto have reliability issues (block 131), an automated report is generatedand sent indicating that the data is not valid or reliable (block 133).If the data is reliable but not valid at block 131, an automated alertand report is generated to initiate component troubleshooting and wellmeasurement instrument component repair (block 135).

FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary data flow for validating permanentdownhole monitoring system (PDHMS) measurements and estimating,real-time, the fluid gradient using associated bottom hole gaugemeasurements. At block 141, real-time PDHMS, multiphase flow meter(MPFM), and wellhead pressure/temperature(WHP/T) data flows into andthrough a SCADA system/server or other information server and to aprocess integration server (block 143). The real-time raw data flow isthen received and processed for validation (blocks 145). If the PDHMSdata meets the validation criteria (block 147), the data is deemedvalidated and the bottom hole fluid gradient is estimated using thePDHMS pressure data (block 149) and the data point is stored in database43. According to an exemplary embodiment, the fluid gradient isestimated by applying an equation for fluid gradient estimation whichincludes a scale of a pressure difference (P2−P1) between shallow (P1)and bottom hole (P2) PDHMS measurement gauges over the height (h)therebetween. The fluid gradient (fg) equation can be written asfg=(P2−P1)/h. If the data does not meet the validation criteria at block147 and the data is determined to have reliability issues (block 151),an automated report is generated and sent indicating that the data isnot valid (block 153). If the data is reliable but not valid at block151, an automated alert and report is generated to initiatetroubleshooting and PDHMS system component repair (block 155).

FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating a fluid gradient versus time trendanalysis illustrating recognition of water incursion at 157 and gassegregation at 159.

FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary data flow for validating multiphase flowmeter (MPFM) measurements and identifying water breakthrough andidentifying/estimating water production. At block 171, real-time PDHMS,multiphase flow meter (MPFM) and wellhead pressure/temperature (WHP/T)data flows into and through a SCADA system/server or other informationserver, and to a process integration server (block 173). The real-timeraw data flow is then received and processed for validation (blocks175). If the PDHMS and WHP/T data values meet the validation criteria(block 177), the data is deemed validated and the bottom hole fluidgradient is estimated and examined to determine if the bottom hole fluidgradient trend is changing to higher values (block 179). If so, and theMPFM values indicate no water production (block 181), an automatedreport is generated to flag the MPFM as having potential calibrationissues (block 183). At the bottom hole gradient trend is not changing tohigher values that the MPFM is reporting water production (block 185),an automated report is generated to flag the MPFM as having potentialcalibration issues (block 183). If the data does not meet the validationcriteria at block 177 and the data is determined to have reliabilityissues (block 181), an automated report is generated and sent indicatingthat the data is not valid or reliable (block 190). If the data isreliable but not valid as determined at block 181, an automated alertand report is generated to initiate component troubleshooting and MPFMcomponent repair (block 183).

FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary data flow for validating multiphase flowmeter (MPFM) measurements and identifying gas breakthrough/gas coming onsolution and identifying/estimating gas production. At block 201,real-time PDHMS, MPFM, and WHP/T data flows into and through a SCADAsystem/server or other information server and to a process integrationserver (block 203). The real-time raw data flow is then received andprocessed for validation (blocks 205). If the PDHMS and WHP/T datavalues meet the validation criteria (block 207), the data is deemedvalidated, the bottom hole fluid gradient is estimated (block 209) andexamined to determine if the bottom hole fluid gradient trend is stableand showing a representative trend (block 211). If so, the data/trendvalues are validated and stored (block 213). If the trend values are notstable/representative and the fluid gradient is deviating downward froma normal field trend (block 215), the gas rate may be increasing and theMPFM should be flagged as having potential calibration issues and alertsprovided (block 217). If the gas rate is increasing, reports and alertsshould be provided indicating potential presence of gas breakthrough orcoming on solution (block 219). If the PDHMS and WHP/T data values domeet the validation criteria at block 207 and the data is deemedreliable (block 221), a report and alert should be initiated reportingfor troubleshooting and repairing the respective components (block 223).If the data is not deemed reliable at block 221, the data should bereported as not valid and alerts published (block 225).

It is important to note that while the foregoing embodiments of thepresent invention have been described in the context of method stepswhich can be performed using or assisted by a fully functional computerapparatus, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanismof at least portions of the present invention and/or aspects thereof arecapable of being distributed in the form of a computer readable mediumin a variety of forms capable of storing a set of instructions forexecution on a processor, processors, or the like, and that variousembodiments of the present invention apply equally regardless of theparticular type of media used to actually carry out the distribution.Examples of the computer readable media include, but are not limited to:nonvolatile, hard-coded type media such as read only memories (ROMs),CD-ROMs, and DVD-ROMs, or erasable, electrically programmable read onlymemories (EEPROMs), recordable type media such as floppy disks, harddisk drives, CD-R/RWs, DVD-RAMs, DVD-R/RWs, DVD+R/RWs, HD-DVDs, memorysticks, mini disks, laser disks, Blu-ray disks, flash drives, and othernewer types of memories, and certain types of transmission type mediasuch as, for example, digital and analog communication links capable ofstoring the set of instructions. Such media can contain, for example,both operating instructions and the operations instructions related toprogram code/product 51 for managing an intelligent field along withcomputer implementable method steps, described above. The appendedclaims may reference, include, or feature “non-transitory computerreadable storage medium” language, which is understood to be a recentU.S. Patent and Trademark Office requirement, and having a meaningdesigned to specifically indicate that the featured computer readablemedium is not a propagating signal per se which was found to benon-statutory (unpatentable) subject matter according to a recent courtcase. It is further understood that non-transitory computer readablestorage medium includes all computer readable storage medium that doesnot fall under the category of being non-statutory subject matter.Attachment 1, appended herewith provides additional program codeaccording to various embodiments the present invention.

Various embodiments of the present invention provide several significantadvantages and/or benefits. For example, various embodiments provide aneffective apparatus and new methodologies to validate, in real time,data from intelligent fields. WDvalidation, for example, is the firstapplication known to the inventors that can validate, in real time, alldynamic data from intelligent fields. Various embodiments of the presentinvention also advantageously provide a unique methodology designed toestimate fluid gradient variance, alteration or changes. Using this newmethodology, the above-described apparatus can precisely determine anywater influx into the oil producer. Additionally, various embodimentsprovide a unique methodology to detect anomalies and recommendcalibration for any of the associated intelligent field componentsdeemed to be out of tolerance. Various embodiments of the presentinvention can process to validate huge amount of data. As such,application of the various apparatus, methods, methodologies, andtechniques can tremendously enhance the process of validating data.

Notably, during operational testing to which conventional methodologieswere previously applied at a reservoir, ten wells were found to betransmitting bad data after implementing first phase of WDvalidation.Six MPFMs were also detected to be candidates for calibration.Accordingly, it has been shown not such action will have a tremendousimpact on cost saving as well as ensure reliable data to engineers'desktop.

This application is a non-provisional of and claims priority to and thebenefit of U.S. Patent App. No. 61/582,350, filed on Dec. 31, 2011,titled “Real-Time Dynamic Data Validation Apparatus, System, ProgramCode, Computer Readable Medium, and Methods For Intelligent Fields,” andis related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/731,238, filed on Dec.31, 2012, titled “Real-Time Dynamic Data Validation Methods forIntelligent Fields, ” each incorporated by reference in its entirety.

In the drawings and specification, there have been disclosed a typicalpreferred embodiment of the invention, and although specific terms areemployed, the terms are used in a descriptive sense only and not forpurposes of limitation. The invention has been described in considerabledetail with specific reference to these illustrated embodiments. It willbe apparent, however, that various modifications and changes can be madewithin the spirit and scope of the invention as described in theforegoing specification.

That claimed is:
 1. An apparatus for managing an intelligent field, the apparatus comprising: a plurality of hydrocarbon well instruments, the well instruments comprising: a permanent downhole monitoring system (PDHMS), a multiphase flow meter (MPFM), a wellhead pressure (WHP) and wellhead temperature (WHT) measurement device, a tubing or casing annulus (TCA) pressure measurement, and optionally an electrical submersible pump (ESP) when desired; a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system for an intelligent hydrocarbon recovery field system, the SCADA system operably coupled to the plurality of well instruments to receive data from the plurality of well instruments; a process integration (PI) server for the intelligent field system, the PI server operably coupled to the SCADA system to receive data from the SCADA system; a dynamic field data analyzing computer including a processor and memory coupled to the processor, the dynamic field data analyzing computer operably coupled to the PI server to receive data from the PI server; and dynamic field data analyzing program code stored in the memory of the dynamic field data analyzing computer and including instructions that when executed by the dynamic field data analyzing computer, cause the computer to perform the operations of: receiving real-time dynamic field data for the intelligent field system, the real-time field data comprising one or more well instrument data values for each of the plurality of well instruments; analyzing validity of the dynamic field data, the analysis including comparing the one or more well instrument data values for at least one of the plurality of well instruments to validation criteria to determine whether one or more of the well instrument data values fall within respective validation criteria; in response to determining that one or more of the well instrument data values fall within the respective validation criteria, validating the one or more well instrument data values that fall within the respective validation criteria; in response to determining that one or more of the well instrument data values fall outside the respective validation criteria: flagging the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria for the at least one well instrument; determining whether the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria are reliable; in response to determining the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria are reliable, generating an alert indicating the that the one or more well instrument data values are reliable and invalid; and in response to determining the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria are unreliable, generating a report indicating the that the one or more well instrument data values are unreliable and invalid.
 2. The apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the validation criteria comprises a range of expected well instrument data values for the respective at least one well instrument based upon actual data values of at least two other of the plurality of well instruments.
 3. The apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise establishing a neural network among the actual well instrument values for each of the plurality of well instruments to establish the validation criteria to thereby identify individual data points which fall outside an expected range of values for observed conditions.
 4. The apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the operation of receiving the real-time dynamic field data includes receiving data from the PI server, the PI server receiving data from the SCADA system, and the SCADA system receiving data from at least three of the plurality of well instruments; and wherein the well instruments data comprises data from at least three of the following sets of data: real-time PDHMS pressure and temperature data, real-time MPFM oil, gas, and water flow data, WHP and WHT data, TCA pressure data, and ESP electrical and pump parameters data.
 5. The apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise estimating bottom hole fluid gradient responsive to real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from both a bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and a shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit located a distance from the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit.
 6. The apparatus as defined in claim 5, wherein the received data includes real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from the shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit; wherein the respective at least one well instrument comprises the PDHMS measurement system; wherein the operation of analyzing validity of the dynamic field data includes analyzing the validity of the real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from both the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and the shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit; wherein the validation criteria comprises a range of expected PDHMS pressure data values for the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and a range of expected PDHMS pressure data values for the shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit; and wherein the operation of validating one or more well instrument data values that fall within the respective validation criteria includes validating the real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from both the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and the shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit.
 7. The apparatus as defined in claim 5, wherein the operations further comprise: determining a trend in real-time dynamic WHP data; determining a trend in real-time dynamic WHT data; and determining an increase in water entering the well when the bottom hole fluid gradient trend is higher, the wellhead pressure trend is lower, and the wellhead temperature trend is higher.
 8. The apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: estimating a bottom hole fluid gradient trend responsive to real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from both a bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and a shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit located a distance from the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit; flagging the MPFM as having potential calibration issues when the estimated bottom hole fluid gradient trend is changing to higher values and the MPFM values indicate little or no water production; and flagging the MPFM as having potential calibration issues when the estimated bottom hole fluid gradient trend is not changing to higher values in the MPFM values indicate water production.
 9. The apparatus as defined in claim 8, wherein the received data includes the real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit, real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from the shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit, and one or more of the following: real-time dynamic WHP data and real-time dynamic WHT data, individually and collectively defining wellhead data; wherein the operation of analyzing validity of the dynamic field data includes analyzing the validity of the real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from both the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and the shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit, and of the real-time dynamic wellhead data; and wherein the operation of validating the one or more well instrument data values that fall within the respective validation criteria includes validating the real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from both the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and the shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit, and from the wellhead data.
 10. The apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: estimating a bottom hole fluid gradient trend responsive to real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from both a bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and a shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit located a distance from the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit; flagging the MPFM as having potential calibration issues when the estimated bottom hole fluid gradient trend is changing to lower values and the MPFM values indicate little or no gas rate increase indicative of potential presence of gas breakthrough or coming on solution; and flagging the MPFM as having potential calibration issues when the estimated bottom hole fluid gradient trend is not changing to lower values in the MPFM values indicate a gas rate increase indicative of potential presence of gas breakthrough or coming on solution.
 11. A non-transitory computer readable medium having processor readable code stored thereon, the processor readable code executable by one or more processors of a dynamic field data analyzing computer to perform operations for managing an intelligent field, the operations comprising: receiving real-time dynamic field data for an intelligent field system, the real-time field data comprising one or more well instrument data values for each of a plurality of well instruments for a well; analyzing validity of the dynamic field data, the analysis including comparing the one or more well instrument data values for at least one of the plurality of well instruments to validation criteria to determine whether one or more of the well instrument data values fall within respective validation criteria; in response to determining that one or more of the well instrument data values fall within the respective validation criteria, validating the one or more well instrument data values that fall within the respective validation criteria; in response to determining that one or more of the well instrument data values fall outside the respective validation criteria: flagging the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria for the at least one well instrument; determining whether the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria are reliable; in response to determining the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria are reliable, generating an alert indicating the that the one or more well instrument data values are reliable and invalid; and in response to determining the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria are unreliable, generating a report indicating the that the one or more well instrument data values are unreliable and invalid.
 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 11, wherein the validation criteria for at least one of the plurality of well instruments is determined based upon the observed values of at least two other of the plurality of well instruments.
 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 11, wherein the validation criteria for at least one of the plurality of well instruments comprises a range of expected well instrument data values for the at least one well instrument based upon observed data values of at least two other of the plurality of well instruments.
 14. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 11, wherein the operations further comprise establishing a neural network among the well instrument values for each of the plurality of well instruments to establish the validation criteria to thereby identify individual data points which fall outside an expected range of values for observed conditions.
 15. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 11, the operations further comprising: in response to determining, based on one or more of the well instrument data values, that a plurality of well conditions for the well have been satisfied within preselected tolerances, validating a well state of the well, wherein the well is an oil producer, and wherein the well state comprises one of the following: well shut-in, well on, oil production increase, oil production decrease, gas oil ratio (GOR) increase, GOR decrease, water cut increase, water cut decrease, bottom hole pressure decrease, bottom hole pressure increase, bottom hole temperature decrease, and bottom hole temperature increase.
 16. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein if the well is a water injector, the well state comprises one of the following: well off, well on, water injection rate increase, and water injection rate decrease; and wherein if the well is an observation well, the well state comprises one of the following: well off and well on.
 17. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well state is a well shut-in state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least three of the following: upstream pressure=downstream pressure; a wellhead temperature (WHT) decrease and the WHT is close to ambient Temperature; choke size is less than approximately two percent; a flowing bottom hole pressure (BHP) increase; a flowing bottom hole temperature (BHT) decrease; and when the well is completed with an electrical submersible pump: a frequency of zero, and current of zero amps.
 18. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well state is a well on state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least three of the following: upstream pressure is not equal to downstream pressure; a well head temperature increase; a choke size greater than zero; and when the well is completed with an electrical submersible pump: a frequency greater than zero, and current greater than zero amps.
 19. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well state is an oil production increase state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least three of the following: a flowing well head pressure decrease; a well head temperature increase; a choke size increase; a flowing bottom pressure decrease; a flowing bottom temperature increase; and when the well is completed with an electrical submersible pump: a frequency level increase, a current level increase, a bottom hole intake pressure decrease, and a bottom hole discharge pressure increase.
 20. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well state is an oil production decrease state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least three of the following: a flowing well head pressure increase; a well head temperature decrease but still above ambient temperature; a choke size decrease; a bottom hole pressure increase; a bottom hole temperature decrease; and when the wells is completed with an electrical submersible pump: a frequency level decrease, a current level decrease, an intake pressure increase, and a discharge pressure decrease.
 21. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well state is a water cut increase state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least two of the following: a well head pressure decrease; a fluid gradient increase; a well head temperature increase; and a bottom hole pressure decrease.
 22. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well state is a water cut decrease state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least two of the following: a well head pressure increase; a fluid gradient decrease; a well head temperature decrease; and a bottom hole pressure increase.
 23. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well state is a bottom hole pressure decrease state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least two of the following: a choke size increase; a WHT increase; and a bottom hole temperature increase.
 24. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well state is a bottom hole pressure increase state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least two of the following: a choke size decrease; a well head temperature decrease; and a bottom hole temperature decrease.
 25. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well is a water injector well, wherein the well state is a well off state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least two of the following: a choke size less than approximately 5%; a WHP decrease; and a WHT decrease and close to ambient temperature.
 26. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well is a water injector well, wherein the well state is a well on state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least two of the following: a choke size greater than approximately 10%; a WHP increase; and a WHT decrease.
 27. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well is a water injector well, wherein the well state is a water injection rate increase state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least two of the following: a choke size increase; a WHP increase; and a WHT increase.
 28. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well is a water injector well, wherein the well state is a water injection rate decrease state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least two of the following: a choke size decrease; a WHP decrease; and a WHT decrease.
 29. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well is an observation well, wherein the well state is a well off state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least three of the following: a choke size less than approximately 0.2%; a WHP decrease; a WHT decrease and close to ambient temperature; a stable bottom hole pressure; and a stable bottom hole temperature.
 30. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well is an observation well, wherein the well state is a well on state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least three of the following: a choke size greater than zero; a WHP increase; a WHT increase and above ambient temperature; a bottom hole pressure decrease; and a bottom hole temperature decrease.
 31. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well state is a GOR increase state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least two of the following: a water cut increase; a well head pressure increase; a fluid gradient decrease; and a well head temperature decrease.
 32. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 15, wherein the well state is a GOR decrease state, and wherein the plurality of the well conditions comprise at least two of the following: a well head pressure decrease; a fluid gradient increase; and a well head temperature increase.
 33. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 11, wherein the operations further comprise: estimating bottom hole fluid gradient responsive to real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from both a bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and a shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit located a distance from the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit.
 34. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 33, wherein the operations further comprise: determining a trend in real-time dynamic WHP data; determining a trend in real-time dynamic WHT data; and determining an increase in water entering the well when the bottom hole fluid gradient trend is higher, the wellhead pressure trend is lower, and the wellhead temperature trend is higher.
 35. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 11, wherein the operations further comprise: estimating a bottom hole fluid gradient trend responsive to real-time dynamic PDHMS pressure data from both a bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and a shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit located a distance from the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit; flagging a multiphase flow meter (MPFM) as having potential calibration issues when the estimated bottom hole fluid gradient trend is changing to higher values and MPFM values indicate little or no water production; and flagging the MPFM as having potential calibration issues when the estimated bottom hole fluid gradient trend is not changing to higher values in the MPFM values indicate water production.
 36. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 11, wherein the operations further comprise: estimating a bottom hole fluid gradient trend responsive to real-time dynamic PDHMS pressre data from both a bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit and a shallow PDHMS pressure measurement unit located a distance from the bottom hole PDHMS pressure measurement unit; flagging an MPFM as having potential calibration issues when the estimated bottom hole fluid gradient trend is changing to lower values and MPFM values indicate little or no gas rate increase indicative of potential presence of gas breakthrough or coming on solution; and flagging the MPFM as having potential calibration issues when the estimated bottom hole fluid gradient trend is not changing to lower values in the MPFM values indicate a gas rate increase indicative of potential presence of gas breakthrough or coming on solution.
 37. The non-transitory computer readable medium as defined in claim 11, wherein the operation of receiving the real-time field data includes receiving data from a process integration (PI) server, the PI server receiving data from a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system, and the SCADA system receiving data from the plurality of well instruments, and the well instruments data comprising at least three of the following sets of data: real-time permanent downhole monitoring system (PDHMS) pressure and temperature data, real-time multiphase flow meter (MPFM) oil, gas, and water flow data, wellhead pressure (WHP) and wellhead temperature (WHT) data, tubing or casing annulus (TCA) pressure data, and electrical submersible pump (ESP) electrical and pump parameters data.
 38. A method for managing an intelligent field, the method comprising a processor of a data analyzing computer executing code stored on a memory to performing the following operations: receiving real-time dynamic field data for an intelligent field system, the real-time field data comprising one or more well instrument data values for each of a plurality of well instruments for a well; analyzing validity of the dynamic field data, the analysis including comparing the one or more well instrument data values for at least one of the plurality of well instruments to validation criteria to determine whether one or more of the well instrument data values fall within respective validation criteria; in response to determining that one or more of the well instrument data values fall within the respective validation criteria, validating the one or more well instrument data values that fall within the respective validation criteria; in response to determining that one or more of the well instrument data values fall outside the respective validation criteria: flagging the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria for the at least one well instrument; determining whether the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria are reliable; in response to determining the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria are reliable, generating an alert indicating the that the one or more well instrument data values are reliable and invalid; and in response to determining the one or more well instrument data values that fall outside the respective validation criteria are unreliable, generating a report indicating the that the one or more well instrument data values are unreliable and invalid. 